Online scams in Winnipeg continue to grow each year and are becoming harder to identify in the busy world we live in. Staying safe begins with knowing how these scams work and how to respond. 

Online fraud affects Canadians of all ages, and many scams now appear legitimate enough to deceive even cautious internet users. With more people relying on online accounts for banking, shopping, social connections, and communication, criminals have more opportunities to steal information, money, or a person’s identity. This guide outlines common scams, warning signs, and simple steps you can take to protect yourself:

Understanding Online Scams In Winnipeg

Online scams in Winnipeg mirror trends seen across Canada, but local reports show an increase during periods of heightened digital activity. During Fraud Prevention Month, Winnipeg Police remind residents that fraudsters use social pressure, urgency, and impersonation to exploit trust. The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre consistently warns that identity theft, account breaches, and investment scams cost Canadians millions each year.

Scammers pretend to be a trusted company, government agency, or financial institution. They may request personal details, redirect you to a fake site, or trick you into sending payment. Recognizing the signs early helps you avoid falling victim to these schemes.

Common Types Of Online Scams Targeting Winnipeg

Phishing Emails & Fake Websites

Phishing occurs when scammers send a message or link that appears legitimate. These messages often claim there is an issue with your online accounts, a missed payment, or a refund waiting for you. Once you click, you may be directed to a false website designed to collect financial information, login credentials, or your social insurance number.

Phishing emails may include:

• Slightly altered addresses or misspelled company names
• Urgent language urging immediate action
• Attachments that infect your computer or devices

Fake websites often mimic banks, courier services, or Government of Canada portals. Always verify the site, the sender, and any unusual request for personal information.

Identity Theft & Data Breaches

Identity theft remains one of the most damaging online crimes. Scammers use stolen information to open credit lines, redirect benefits, or send fraudulent payment requests. Large-scale data breaches across organizations can expose personal records, while targeted attacks may access a single person’s online accounts.

A compromised identity may involve:

• Unexplained accounts in your name
• Unauthorized purchases
• Notices about a change to your date of birth or address
• Messages from your bank asking about suspicious activity

Staying alert and monitoring your accounts helps you catch problems early.

Online Shopping & E-Commerce Scams

As the internet becomes a primary place for retail, online shopping scams have increased. Fraudsters create fake storefronts, post misleading ads, or use marketplace platforms to collect money without delivering products.

Common red flags include:

• Prices that are far below market value
• Sellers who refuse to verify their identity
• Missing contact information
• Poor site security or broken “About Us” pages

Before ordering, research the seller, read reviews, and confirm you are dealing with a legitimate company.

Investment & Cryptocurrency Scams

Investment scams promise high returns with no risk. Many involve cryptocurrency, foreign exchange, or unlicensed trading platforms. These scams may appear professional, and some even involve fake advisors claiming to be registered with a government agency.

Signs of a possible investment scam include:

• Pressure to invest “at the moment”
• Promises of guaranteed profits
• Difficulty withdrawing your own money
• A refusal to provide documentation that you can independently confirm

Always talk to a financial professional before investing and ensure the platform is recognized by Canadian regulators.

Warning Signs You May Be A Target

Scammers often rely on emotional manipulation. You may be a target if you experience any of the following:

• Sudden requests for information, including your SIN number
• Messages claiming you must act immediately
• Unexpected calls from your bank or local police
• Emails stating that your online accounts will be closed
• Requests for gift card payments, wire transfers, or cryptocurrency
• Communications that seem legitimate but feel suspicious

If anything feels unusual, pause and verify the contact source.

Steps To Protect Yourself From Online Scams

Staying safe online becomes much easier when you follow a few practical habits. These simple steps strengthen your digital security, reduce your risk of falling victim, and help protect your information, money, and online accounts from scammers:

Keep Software & Devices Updated

Security updates help guard against vulnerabilities that criminals exploit. Keep your phone, computer, and apps updated to ensure you have the strongest protections.

Use Strong Passwords & Two-Factor Authentication

Use unique passwords for all online accounts and enable two-factor authentication wherever possible. A strong password reduces the risk of a breach, and a verification code adds an additional layer of protection.

Verify Contacts Before Sharing Personal Information

Never respond to unexpected phone calls, texts, or emails asking for financial information, account access, or ID numbers. Always confirm the contact through a trusted phone number or website.

Monitor Financial Accounts Regularly

Review your statements, transaction history, and credit reports. Monitoring helps you recognize unusual activity early and gives you time to notify your bank or local police.

What To Do If You Fall Victim To An Online Scam

If you believe you are a victim of fraud, act quickly to reduce the impact:

1. Report the incident to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre.
2. Notify your bank and freeze compromised online accounts.
3. Change your passwords and secure your devices.
4. Contact your credit bureau to add alerts related to identity theft.
5. Inform your local police if financial loss or impersonation occurred.

These steps help limit further harm and support ongoing investigations by law enforcement agencies.

Take Action Today: Protect Yourself Online

Staying safe on the internet requires awareness, caution, and consistent protective habits. As fraud prevention remains a priority in Canada, taking time to learn the warning signs helps you avoid becoming a target. 

If you have been accused of fraud, identity theft, or a cyber-related offence, speaking with an experienced criminal defence lawyer early can make a critical difference. 

Brodsky Amy & Gould, Winnipeg Criminal Defence Lawyers, provide strategic legal guidance to individuals facing fraud and cybercrime charges. Our team can help you understand the allegations, protect your rights, and work through the criminal justice process clearly. 

The post The Rise Of Online Scams In Winnipeg And How To Stay Safe appeared first on Brodsky Amy & Gould.

source https://gregbrodsky.ca/the-rise-of-online-scams-in-winnipeg-and-how-to-stay-safe/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-rise-of-online-scams-in-winnipeg-and-how-to-stay-safe

Firearm ownership in Canada is governed by strict regulations that define how different classes of firearms may be used, owned, or transferred. Understanding the distinction between prohibited firearms and restricted firearms is vital for anyone who owns, collects, or uses a rifle or shotgun. These classifications, outlined in the Criminal Code and the Firearms Act, determine what types of weapons can be legally possessed, the licensing requirements, and the penalties for misuse.

Overview Of Canadian Firearm Classifications

Under Canadian law, all firearms are divided into three categories: Non-restricted, restricted, and prohibited. Each classification has its own rules governing ownership, storage, and transport:

• Non-restricted firearms include most rifles or shotguns commonly used for hunting and target shooting.
• Restricted firearms include certain handguns and semi-automatic rifles that meet specific barrel length or design criteria.
• Prohibited firearms are the most tightly controlled; in most cases, civilians cannot acquire or possess them.

The chief firearms officer in each province or territory oversees licensing, authorizations, and compliance with these laws. Even antique firearms (while exempt from some provisions) are still subject to safety and transport regulations.

Prohibited Firearms: Definition And Examples

The Firearms Act defines a prohibited firearm as one that meets specific mechanical or dimensional criteria that make it unsafe or unsuitable for civilian use. Typically, these weapons are capable of firing in a semi-automatic manner or automatic mode, or they have been designed or adapted for concealment or rapid fire.

Common examples of prohibited firearms include:

• Automatic firearms capable of firing multiple rounds with a single pull of the trigger
• Handguns with a barrel equal to or less than 105 mm, or such a handgun designed to discharge .25 or .32 calibre ammunition
• Firearms with a barrel length equal to or less than 470 mm that are capable of being discharged when folded or reduced in size
• Converted automatics, which are guns that were originally automatic but altered to fire in a semi-automatic fashion

The list of firearms prescribed as prohibited can change through regulations or through Orders in Council. This includes certain air guns with a muzzle velocity or muzzle energy that meet specific thresholds.

In short, prohibited firearms are generally those considered to pose a higher public safety risk or to have no reasonable sporting or hunting purpose.

Restricted Firearms: Definition And Examples

A restricted firearm is less tightly controlled than a prohibited one but still requires enhanced licensing and authorization to use. According to the Criminal Code, restricted firearms include:

• Any handgun not classified as prohibited
• Any rifle or shotgun that is not prohibited but can fire in a semi-automatic manner and has a barrel length of less than 470 mm
• Any firearm prescribed by regulation as restricted

Examples include many popular handguns used for target practice or international sporting competitions governed by the International Shooting Union. Certain firearms may also be restricted based on their ability to use detachable cartridge magazines capable of holding more than the lawful limit of calibre ammunition.

Importantly, a restricted weapon can only be discharged at approved target shooting competitions or ranges, or used for a lawful profession such as policing or security.

Legal Requirements For Ownership

Owning or possessing a restricted or prohibited firearm requires more than a general firearms licence. A person must hold a Possession and Acquisition Licence (PAL) with the appropriate class, complete the Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course, and receive approval from the chief firearms officer.

Additional obligations include:

• Registering the firearm with the Canadian Firearms Registry
• Storing and transporting the weapon according to federal regulations
• Obtaining an Authorization to Transport (ATT) if the firearm is to be moved for target practice or competitions

Firearms owners must also ensure that any rifle or shotgun they possess does not fall into the prohibited category due to a modification that changes its barrel length, muzzle energy, or overall capability.

Penalties For Non-Compliance

The consequences for unlawful possession of prohibited or restricted firearms are severe. Offences under the Criminal Code can lead to significant fines, imprisonment, and the permanent loss of a firearms licence.

Some examples include:

• Possession of a prohibited weapon or prohibited device without authorization
• Possession of a firearm capable of discharging centre-fire ammunition in a semi-automatic or automatic mode
• Possession of an unlawfully manufactured firearm or one with an altered serial number
• Use of a restricted weapon in a way that endangers public safety or causes serious bodily injury

Penalties vary depending on the circumstances and whether the firearm was used in the commission of another offence. For example, using a barrelled weapon capable of discharging centre-fire ammunition during a robbery can result in mandatory minimum sentences.

Staying Compliant With Firearm Regulations

Maintaining compliance as a gun owner in Canada requires constant awareness of changing laws and regulations. The federal government periodically updates the list of restricted and prohibited firearms, and any new regulations prescribing firearms listed can affect legal ownership.

Here are a few steps for staying compliant:

1. Keep licences up to date. Ensure your PAL and any special authorizations remain valid.
2. Stay informed. Review notices from the chief firearms officer and government bulletins about reclassifications.
3. Maintain proper storage. Store ammunition separately and lock all firearms when not in use.
4. Avoid modifications. Altering a weapon’s barrel length or fitting it with a new cartridge magazine could inadvertently convert it into a restricted or prohibited class.
5. Seek legal advice when unsure. Get legal advice to understand the differences between the Firearms Act, the Criminal Code, and regulations prescribing firearm classifications.

Conclusion

Canada’s firearm laws are designed to balance personal ownership rights with public safety. 

If you are facing charges related to prohibited or restricted firearms or are uncertain about the legal status of certain firearms, obtaining legal guidance can help you navigate these complex regulations and protect your rights under Canadian law.

The post Understanding Prohibited Vs. Restricted Firearm Regulations In Canada appeared first on Brodsky Amy & Gould.

source https://gregbrodsky.ca/understanding-prohibited-vs-restricted-firearm-regulations-in-canada/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=understanding-prohibited-vs-restricted-firearm-regulations-in-canada

The Growing Role Of Social Media In Criminal Cases

In today’s digital age, social media plays a major role in how people communicate, share information, and express themselves. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), and TikTok have become daily fixtures in many lives. They also create vast amounts of information that can be scrutinized during criminal investigations.

For law enforcement agencies, social media content can provide valuable insights into a person’s activities, location, and even state of mind at a given time. A single post, photograph, or private message can have significant implications in criminal cases.

In Canada’s criminal justice system, the use of social media evidence has been steadily increasing. Lawyers, police, and courts now regularly deal with questions about how such evidence is collected, authenticated, and presented in legal proceedings. While these tools can help establish timelines or corroborate witness statements, they also raise concerns about privacy, fairness, and the legal boundaries of evidence gathering.

Types Of Social Media Evidence

Courts and investigators encounter a wide range of material drawn from social media accounts. What follows are common categories and how they typically appear in legal proceedings:

Posts & Status Updates

Public posts and status updates are the most visible kind of social media evidence. Photos from a concert, a short video, or a caption written in the heat of the moment can be compared with other information to test an alibi or confirm a timeline. Prosecutors may argue that social media posts reveal intent or show association with people or places; defence lawyers often point out that sarcasm, hyperbole, and performance are common online. Context matters; a joke can be read as a threat when context is missing.

Private Messages

Private messages can be highly probative when they address planning, motive, or admissions. Access generally requires consent from a party to the conversation or a judicial authorization. Even when obtained lawfully, private messages must be authenticated. This is because courts want assurance that the sender was who the record suggests and that the message thread is complete. Ephemeral chat functions and disappearing messages raise further challenges, as the parties involved may disagree on what was said if only fragments remain.

Location Data

Some social media platforms embed or invite location tagging. Location metadata can be powerful; a tagged photo may place a person in a neighbourhood at a specific time. Errors can occur, such as users spoofing locations, apps defaulting to prior coordinates, or a third party tagging a person who was not present. As with any digital footprints, forensic analysis can confirm or challenge what location data appears to show.

Admissibility Requirements

Canadian courts ask three core questions about social media evidence: Is it relevant, is it authentic, and is its probative value greater than its prejudicial effect. If those questions are answered in favour of admission, the court may still consider Charter issues and other rules that apply to criminal proceedings.

• Relevance: The material must help the trier of fact decide an issue in the case; vague or broadly character-based content tends to carry little weight.
• Authenticity: The party tendering the evidence must show that the item is what it purports to be; this is a threshold, not a high bar, but it must be met.
• Prejudice vs. probative value: Even relevant items can be excluded if the risk of unfair prejudice outweighs their value.

Because social media content is easy to fabricate or manipulate, courts expect parties to explain how they obtained it, who preserved it, and why the trier of fact should trust it. When provincial authorities are involved, the Charter’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure also comes into play. A warrant or production order is typically required to gain access to records not otherwise public. Failure to respect legal boundaries can lead to exclusion.

Authentication Of Social Media Evidence

Authenticating social media content is often the hardest step. A screenshot shows what a viewer saw on a particular day; it does not, by itself, prove authorship or completeness. To authenticate social media evidence, parties commonly use a combination of:

• Source records: Certified records from social media companies, including subscriber information, IP logs, and message histories. These can help link a social media account to a device or user. They also provide a record that is less susceptible to alteration.
• Metadata and device forensics: Digital forensics experts can examine file metadata, hash values, and device artifacts to show when a post was created or whether a photo was edited. This type of forensic analysis can be crucial when authenticity is disputed.
• Witness testimony: This can include a person who created or received a message, identifying it, a friend recognizing a voice on a video, or a workplace record aligning with a timestamp, with the goal of assembling enough building blocks to give the court confidence.

Courts assess the totality of the circumstances; perfect certainty is not required at the authentication stage. Still, the party seeking to rely on the material must do enough to allow the trier of fact to consider it. Put simply, authenticating social media content is a practical exercise; the method used should match the issue in dispute.

Privacy Considerations

Social media activity exists at the intersection of public sharing and personal privacy. While some content is publicly visible, other material (such as private messages or posts shared only with a select audience) may attract a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Canadian courts have recognized that accessing private areas of a person’s online accounts generally requires judicial authorization. Without proper legal authority, evidence gathered in violation of privacy rights may be excluded from criminal proceedings.

Privacy concerns extend beyond the accused; posts made by friends, family members, or unrelated third parties may also be scrutinized during criminal investigations, raising ethical considerations for law enforcement officials and legal teams alike.

Preservation Of Digital Evidence

Digital evidence can be fleeting. Social media companies may remove posts, and users can delete or alter their accounts at any time. Once deleted, retrieving such evidence may be difficult or impossible without timely action.

For this reason, preservation orders are often used to instruct social media companies to maintain relevant data until it can be obtained through proper legal channels. Both the prosecution and the defence must act quickly to gather evidence before it disappears.

Common Legal Challenges

Using social media evidence presents recurring issues that the legal community continues to navigate:

• Hearsay: Statements made online are often out-of-court statements. They may be admissible for limited purposes or under a recognized exception; courts will ask whether safeguards for reliability exist.
• Identity and authorship: More than one person may use a device; multiple people may access a single profile. Proving that the accused authored or adopted a post can be contentious.
• Completeness: Selective snippets can mislead. Context from the full thread or conversation often matters; parties may need to produce more than a single exchange.
• Platform design: Social media companies update features frequently. Defence counsel and prosecutors must keep pace with changes that affect retention, deletion, and export functions.
• Social media surveillance: Long-term, automated monitoring of individuals can raise Charter issues. Courts will consider proportionality and effective law enforcement goals alongside rights.

Impact On Defence Strategy

For a defence team, social media’s impact is a double-edged sword. The material may appear harmful at first glance, but a deeper review can uncover context that softens or defeats the Crown’s theory. Practical defence steps include:

• Audit the record: Compare timestamps, metadata, and device logs. Apparent contradictions can emerge; a post time may reflect a different time zone or a queued upload.
• Test the chain: Ask who captured the material, how it was stored, and whether hash values changed. Weaknesses in the chain of custody can limit the weight.
• Alternative explanations: Social media activity can be performative. Jokes, lyrics, and memes are often misunderstood. Defence lawyers can show that a reasonable, non-incriminating interpretation exists.
• Charter review: If police overstepped legal boundaries to gather evidence, seek exclusion. Even where exclusion is not granted, courts may limit use.
• Jury dynamics: In jury trials, strong instructions can mitigate the risk of undue prejudice. Education about how social media works can help the trier of fact assess reliability fairly.

A careful approach can shift the weight of the evidence presented. Strategic use of digital forensics experts, thoughtful cross-examination, and clear explanations of platform quirks can make all the difference.

Best Practices For Defendants

If you are facing criminal charges, what you do on social media during the legal process can make all the difference. Some practical steps include:

• Pause posting and avoid discussing the incident, parties involved, or the investigation since comments meant for friends can still be found by others.
• Tighten privacy settings on all social media platforms, but remember that private settings reduce exposure without guaranteeing privacy once an investigation starts.
• Do not delete content without advice since deletion can look like spoliation, and preserving context may assist the defence.
• Beware of tags and ask friends not to tag you at events that did not occur or that could cause confusion, since public posts by others can become part of the record.
• Centralize evidence by keeping a private log of relevant posts or messages and sharing it with your lawyer so evidence gathering can proceed lawfully.
• Mind your messages because private messages are not immune from legal scrutiny, and anything written could be read by a court later.

Protecting Your Social Media Rights

Understanding your rights in relation to social media evidence is essential. The Canadian Charter protects against unreasonable search and seizure. This applies to your digital communications as much as to your home or personal property.

If you believe your social media accounts have been accessed without proper legal authority, it is important to discuss this with your legal counsel. Your lawyer can examine whether the evidence was obtained lawfully, and if not, whether it should be excluded from trial.

Legal professionals often stress that in criminal law, the rules around digital evidence are evolving. Staying informed about these changes and working closely with your legal team can help you navigate the challenges posed by social media’s impact on the judicial process.

Conclusion

Social media’s role in Canadian criminal law continues to grow, offering both opportunities and challenges for law enforcement agencies, defence lawyers, and the courts. From public posts to private messages and location data, the range of potential digital evidence is vast. However, admissibility depends on strict rules of relevance, authenticity, and respect for privacy.

The evolving nature of online platforms means that legal frameworks must continually adapt. For anyone facing criminal proceedings, awareness of how social media evidence can be gathered, interpreted, and contested is a crucial part of building an effective defence.

If you are concerned about how your online activities may affect your case, speak with a lawyer who has experience dealing with digital evidence in the criminal justice system. Early advice and careful strategy can help ensure that your rights are protected in today’s complex digital age.

The post Social Media Evidence In Criminal Cases: What Can Be Used? appeared first on Brodsky Amy & Gould.

source https://gregbrodsky.ca/social-media-evidence-in-criminal-cases-what-can-be-used/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=social-media-evidence-in-criminal-cases-what-can-be-used

Facing a criminal trial is arguably one of your life’s most disorienting and high-stakes experiences. This is especially true when the facts presented involve technical or scientific findings. But the courtroom doesn’t just rely on attorneys. Expert witnesses play a critical role by using specialized knowledge to help the court and jury understand details that may otherwise be unclear, like DNA analysis, scientific and medical reports, or data from forensic scientists.

Their insight can directly shape the jury’s perception and challenge the strength of the prosecution’s evidence. The right testimony can make all the difference for those building a defence. This guide explains how expert witness testimony works and why it matters:

Understanding Expert Testimony

Not all evidence speaks for itself. In many criminal defence cases, the outcome hinges on how well the jury understands what the evidence presented means. Expert testimony refers to the in-court statements and opinions of a qualified specialist who uses specialized knowledge to help the judge and jury interpret complex facts.

These experts interpret findings, explain methods, and offer opinions grounded in science, medicine, or other complex fields. For example, a forensic scientist might connect material from a crime scene to a suspect. On the other hand, a mental health professional can shed light on a defendant’s mindset. Their insights help the jury understand complex issues, evaluate physical evidence, and ultimately weigh the case.

Their opinions can support a defence attorney’s strategy or raise reasonable doubt, but only if they withstand brutal cross-examination during the trial. In the criminal justice system, their voices carry weight.

Types Of Expert Witnesses

Every expert brings a different perspective to the courtroom. The legal system uses a wide range of professionals who give opinion testimony based on their training, experience, and adherence to scientific principles.

Once the court accepts an individual’s qualifications, its role is to apply its expertise to the facts and explain its findings within the legal framework. This helps the jury make informed decisions about the charges. Here are the most common types of expert witnesses called to testify in a criminal trial:

• Forensic Experts: These professionals examine physical evidence, often DNA evidence or trace materials found at a crime scene.
• Mental Health Professionals: Psychologists and psychiatrists evaluate whether a defendant is mentally competent to stand trial. In some cases, they assess psychological conditions that may influence criminal responsibility.
• Medical Experts: These professionals interpret injuries or medical complications that relate directly to the alleged crime. Their findings can speak to the severity of the harm or the effects of the substances involved.
• Digital Forensics Experts: These experts analyze all electronic data from phones, computers, and servers. Their work is designed to uncover deleted messages, access logs, or traces of software manipulation tied to the alleged offence.
• Toxicology Experts: Toxicologists evaluate substances found in a person’s system. Their findings often clarify whether impairment was likely at the time of the incident or if exposure to certain chemicals played a role in the events.
• Financial Experts: In fraud or embezzlement cases, financial experts track irregularities in account activity. Their insights generally tend to be intentionally misreporting or disproving the prosecution’s claims.

Qualifying An Expert Witness

Generally, an expert has to meet strict criteria before they can give an opinion in a criminal case. This is known as voir dire in legal terms, where the judge and lawyers get to ask the expert about their background, field experience, and methodology. The role in the case is to confirm that the expert’s opinion is grounded in accepted practice in a particular field.

For example, a psychiatrist testifying about mental health evaluations might need to explain the criteria used to assess a defendant’s capacity to stand trial. When presenting forensic evidence, the expert must clearly show how their methods connect to the technical evidence under review.

They can testify only when the court finds the expert reliable and relevant. That approval allows the defence to build a more robust strategy and introduce alternative explanations to challenge the criminal charges.

Scientific Evidence Presentation

Jurors often encounter material far outside their day-to-day experience. When technical details surface, especially in cases involving electronic evidence, lab results, or psychological assessments, the expert witness must guide them through it. This process begins with clear communication and rests on reliable principles from accepted practice.

A digital forensics specialist may walk the jury through metadata recovered from deleted messages. Or a psychologist might explain how the defendant’s mental state shaped their behaviour during the alleged crime. The testimony must reflect sufficient facts and show how the expert applied established methods to conclude.

The court expects clarity, accuracy, and relevance throughout the trial process. Experts must show that their insights support the defence’s argument through objective analysis. When done well, this testimony helps legal professionals provide alternative explanations and make complex evidence understandable and credible.

Medical Expert Testimony

Medical experts often influence the trial’s outcome in the courtroom more than any single report or chart. Through objective testimony, they help the jury understand injuries, toxicology and the defendant’s state of mind with clinical precision. During direct examination, the lawyer must first establish the expert’s qualifications and the relevance of their findings.

Once admitted, they were emboldened to do more in the case. A medical examiner can pinpoint the cause of death from internal injuries or lab results. A psychiatrist can give insight into the defendant’s capacity to understand their actions to support insanity defences based on diagnostic standards.

Throughout the process, they must explain complex information without losing accuracy. Their insight does more than inform. It creates space for other explanations, strengthens the defence’s argument, and ensures high-stakes decisions involving legal sanctions are made with a full understanding of the medical evidence.

Forensic Expert Analysis

In a criminal trial, sequence and source often decide the case. Forensic experts use their knowledge to examine data, evidence, trace materials, and biological findings at the scene. They may interpret DNA profiles, firearm discharge patterns, or digital activity.

The expert’s job in the courtroom is to present objective evidence based on tested methods and verified results. Each conclusion must be tied to facts and withstand cross-examination from both sides. Legal teams use this information to support their theory of the case or expose holes in the other side’s case. Throughout, ethics are a big part of the process and will be a consideration in the outcome of the defence.

Challenging Expert Witnesses

An expert’s resumé might impress a jury, but credentials alone don’t guarantee credibility. A skilled defence attorney will dissect the expert’s qualifications, question the integrity of their methods, and press for clarity under cross-examination. They’ll typically have experience spotting loopholes that won’t be held up in court. Their expert evidence can unravel whether their opinions fall outside their particular field or rely on flawed science.

Cost Considerations

Expert testimony can completely alter the outcome of a case, but it comes with a price. Understanding where costs add up helps you invest wisely in your defence. The most common charges include:

• Case review and analysis
• Preparation for cross-examination
• Travel and administrative fees

While there are many costs to factor in, expert witnesses build leverage in your case.

Impact On Trial Strategy

Expert witness testimony can shift the entire direction of criminal defence. That’s why it’s important to have proper representation to challenge them when possible. Their analysis oftentimes exposes weaknesses in the prosecution’s case or reinterprets key facts. Strategically using expert input allows the defence to challenge narratives and influence how jurors view the defendant’s guilt.

Maximizing Expert Testimony In Your Defence

Expert witnesses can dismantle faulty claims and expose inconsistencies in the prosecution’s evidence. At Brodsky Amy & Gould, we don’t just bring in experts; we collaborate with them to challenge assumptions and present testimony that supports your defence strategy. When the case turns on interpretation, that level of preparation can shift the outcome.

The post The Role Of Expert Witnesses In Criminal Defence appeared first on Brodsky Amy & Gould.

source https://gregbrodsky.ca/the-role-of-expert-witnesses-in-criminal-defence/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-role-of-expert-witnesses-in-criminal-defence

If you or someone you care about is facing criminal sentencing in Winnipeg, every detail can shape the outcome. The court does not rely solely on the facts of the offence;  judges examine aggravating and mitigating factors to determine whether a more lenient or more severe sentence is appropriate.

Mitigating circumstances such as mental or physical illness, expressions of remorse, or a lack of prior convictions can influence the court’s decision. An experienced defence lawyer can identify and present these factors in a way that supports your case and helps to guide the court toward a fair and balanced outcome.

The Impact Of Factors On Sentencing

Sentencing is one of the most critical phases in any criminal case and often the most misunderstood. In Winnipeg, the sentencing process is considered far more than the offence itself. Under Section 718.2 of the Criminal Code of Canada, judges must evaluate both mitigating and aggravating factors to determine an appropriate sentence. These factors help the court assess the offender’s level of responsibility and the broader context of the case.

That said, a well-prepared criminal lawyer can present evidence showing how personal circumstances, such as mental health issues, genuine remorse, or the absence of a prior criminal history, may justify a more lenient sentence.

Common Aggravating Factors

When a judge sentences in Winnipeg, certain facts about the offence or the offender can increase the sentence. These are called aggravating factors and carry a lot of weight at sentencing. Under Canadian criminal justice standards, these elements suggest greater blame, danger to society, or intent to harm, and they can overshadow even strong mitigating factors in criminal cases. Prosecutors often emphasize these points to argue for more severe consequences. Anyone facing criminal charges should understand which circumstances may be considered aggravating factors.

Some of the most common aggravating factors include:

• Previous criminal record: Repeated offences or a pattern of similar convictions can increase penalties, especially if the current charge is for the same crime.
• Targeting based on sexual orientation or gender identity: Offences motivated by hate or bias are considered especially harmful and often result in longer sentences.
• Use of violence or weapons: Physical harm, threats, or the use of a weapon significantly increases the severity of the crime.
• Victim vulnerability: Crimes involving children, elderly individuals, or persons with disabilities are treated more seriously by the court.
• Breach of trust or authority: Offenders in positions of power, such as caregivers, employers, or public officials, face more severe outcomes if that trust is abused.
• Planned or organized conduct: Offences that show premeditation or strategic execution can lead to a harsher sentence.
• Significant stolen or damaged property: The extent of loss or destruction can influence the court’s view of the offence’s seriousness.
• Association with criminal organizations: Involvement in crimes that benefit gangs or larger networks adds weight to sentencing decisions.
• Impact on the victim: If the victim experienced lasting psychological trauma, serious injury, or financial hardship, this can be used to justify a tougher penalty.
• Repeat violence in domestic or intimate partner cases: Repeated acts within relationships, particularly involving power and control, are treated as aggravating.
• Motivated by discrimination or prejudice: Crimes rooted in race, religion, ethnicity, or other protected characteristics often carry additional weight in sentencing.

Prior Criminal Record

A prior criminal record is one of the most significant aggravating factors in determining sentences for violent crimes in Winnipeg. Courts view a history of convictions as a pattern of unlawful behaviour that raises public risk and undermines rehabilitation potential.

If the same crime or similar offences appear in the record, the judge may impose harsher penalties, including lengthy incarceration rather than house arrest or a reduced sentence.

Repeat offences signal to the court that earlier consequences failed to deter the crime committed, especially when violence or harm to vulnerable victims is involved. A first-time offender might receive a lighter sentence, but once a record exists, it becomes harder to argue for leniency, even when presenting common mitigating factors like mental illness or the offender’s remorse.

Use Of Weapons

Prior criminal history carries a lot of weight in sentencing, and so does the use of weapons. Judges see it as a sign that the offender poses a greater risk to the public. Weapons increase the risk of irreparable harm, especially in cases of multiple victims or community settings. These circumstances are crucial in the final sentence, often ruling out options like house arrest. Even a guilty plea may not offset the impact when firearms or knives are involved. Among other aggravating factors, weapon use is one of the clearest triggers for maximum penalties.

Key Mitigating Factors

Certain factors in criminal sentencing may support a reduced sentence when they show the offender took steps to address addiction or struggled with issues that affected judgment.

No Prior Record

A lack of prior convictions can play a significant role in reducing the severity of sentencing for violent crimes in Winnipeg. While it doesn’t excuse the harm caused, it may suggest the offence was isolated and not part of a pattern of repeat offences. Judges may be more open to alternatives like house arrest, especially when supported by strong rehabilitation efforts or clear family support.

The absence of a record can also influence how intervention programs are applied and whether long-term incarceration is necessary. These factors feed into the overall risk, intent and reintegration assessment, especially if the offence wasn’t for financial gain or hate crimes.

Expressions Of Remorse

While remorse won’t undo what’s been done, it still plays a role in sentencing, especially for violent offences in Winnipeg. When an offender acknowledges the harm they caused and takes responsibility, the court will view them as more open to rehabilitation. This recognition of harm to the victim’s life can support house arrest or community-based sentencing.

Judges weigh remorse alongside other factors like mental health to determine if leniency is warranted. With the help of a lawyer, a sincere apology, or evidence of change in behaviour can shift the court’s focus to rehabilitation over punishment without minimizing the offence.

How Courts Weigh Different Factors

Courts in Winnipeg don’t rely on one detail alone when deciding a sentence. Instead, judges assess the full picture to determine what’s fair under the law and proportionate to the crime committed.

• Aggravating factors: These can justify harsher penalties, especially when tied to violence or a previous criminal record.
• Mitigating details: A guilty plea, efforts toward rehabilitation, or issues that affect judgment may lead to options like house arrest or a lighter sentence.

The Role Of Presentence Reports

Presentence reports (PSRs) are prepared by probation officers after a guilty plea or conviction. They give the judge a detailed picture of the offender’s background, risk level and rehabilitation efforts. In violent crime cases, this report can determine whether someone gets jail or a community-based sentence like house arrest. Judges use PSRs to get to the root of the crime and decide if factors like mental health or addiction may have been a factor in the decision-making.

Impact Of Character References

In violent crime cases, character references help courts evaluate whether an appropriate sentence should include consideration of the offender’s values, relationships, or history of positive behaviour.

These letters often come from individuals who know the person well and can speak to their conduct outside of the offence. Judges may view strong references as common mitigating factors, especially when they highlight ongoing family support or a commitment to change.

Strategies For Presenting Mitigating Factors

In Winnipeg’s criminal justice system, the way mitigating factors are presented can strongly influence how courts approach determining sentences. A well-structured approach supported by evidence can give weight to the defence’s case.

• Mitigating circumstances: Explain the offender’s background, including hardship, trauma, or other relevant context.
• Guilty plea and remorse: Be sure to also highlight sincere acknowledgment of wrongdoing and efforts to change.
• Supporting evidence: Your case must include character letters from trusted references, treatment records, or restitution documentation.

Importance Of Professional Legal Representation

Navigating sentencing requires more than a basic understanding of the law. A skilled lawyer can present mitigating factors and fight for an appropriate sentence. The legal team at Brodsky, Amy & Gould has the experience to help. Contact us today to protect your rights and secure the best possible outcome.

The post Understanding Aggravating And Mitigating Factors In Violent Crime Cases appeared first on Brodsky Amy & Gould.

source https://gregbrodsky.ca/understanding-aggravating-and-mitigating-factors-in-violent-crime-cases/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=understanding-aggravating-and-mitigating-factors-in-violent-crime-cases

Being charged with assault after defending yourself is terrifying, especially if you reacted to potential harm. Now you’re navigating the criminal justice system, unsure of your rights, wondering what comes next. This guide explains how a skilled criminal defence lawyer can help you present a viable defence rooted in criminal law:

Understanding Self-Defence In Canadian Law

In Canada, a self-defence argument rests on whether the person acted with an honest and reasonable belief that they or someone else was in serious danger. Section 34 of the Criminal Code outlines that force may be used if the response is considered reasonable based on the situation. Courts in Manitoba, including Winnipeg, examine both the perceived threat and the reaction to it, especially in cases involving deadly force.

They assess factors like the accused’s role in the incident, available options, and the nature of the threat. The law recognizes that people don’t make perfect decisions under stress. What matters is whether their actions hold up under the lens of reason. According to Canada’s official guide, the force used must match the threat, or it risks being viewed as excessive under criminal law.

Legal Requirements For Self-Defence Claims

Canadian law sets specific conditions that must be met for a self-defence claim to be considered valid. Here’s what you need to know:

Reasonable Force

A viable defence of self-defence requires that the force used is judged as reasonable based on the situation. Under Canadian criminal law, this means the response must match the threat, not exceed it.

If someone swings a fist, responding with a weapon could be considered excessive force, especially in cases that lead to bodily harm or an aggravated assault charge. Courts in Manitoba will assess the risk of imminent danger, any opportunity to de-escalate, and the severity of the threat.

Reasonable Belief Of Threat

A self-defence claim begins with what the accused perceived at the moment of the incident. In Manitoba, courts assess the situation through the lens of the person claiming self-defence, factoring in the tension, surroundings, and behaviour of the other party.

If someone reaches into their coat during a heated confrontation and the accused believes a weapon is being drawn, that belief must be objectively reasonable. Without it, the claim may collapse, even if the prosecution’s evidence is weak.

Types Of Threats That Justify Self-Defence

A threat must present an immediate danger, and the accused’s actions must reflect what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation. Here are some examples that may justify threats and can serve as legal grounds for self-defence:

• Physical Assault: Punches, kicks, or choking may justify the use of force if there’s no chance to retreat.
• Sexual Assault: Defending against rape or unwanted physical contact can be grounds for a self-defence claim.
• Attempted Murder or Armed Threats: Drawing a weapon in close proximity could justify deadly force.
• Defence of Others: Protecting a friend or family member from serious harm can support a viable defence.
• Mistaken Identity: When someone wrongly targets you with aggression, the law applies if your response is reasonable.

Documenting Evidence For Self-Defence Claims

Building a viable self-defence claim requires more than just saying you felt threatened. The court wants evidence that supports your story, aligns with how an average person might react, and creates enough doubt to challenge the prosecution’s version of events. While your criminal defence lawyer will guide the legal strategy, documenting the right details can shift the entire case in your favour.

As part of the legal process, it’s good to have these types of supporting evidence to help give you the best odds in your case:

• Incident Reports: Police reports or medical evaluations that show injuries or document the scene
• Surveillance Footage: Video evidence from nearby businesses, homes, or traffic cameras
• Photos: Images of injuries, property damage, or the environment where the alleged assault took place
• Personal Notes: Written documentation capturing what happened before and after the incident, while it’s still fresh
• Text Messages or Voicemails: Any communication that reflects threats or hostile behaviour leading up to the event

Common Challenges To Self-Defence Claims

Even when self-defence seems justified, several factors can complicate your claim. One of the most common challenges is disproving that you were the initial aggressor or that you had a chance to avoid the confrontation. Prosecutors often argue that the force used was disproportionate or that you could have protected yourself without violence. If the threat wasn’t clearly visible, your perception of danger may be questioned.

Domestic violence, imperfect self-defence, or mental health can also raise doubt, especially if expert evidence isn’t presented clearly. Without strong legal expertise, these can lead to a plea or even an assault conviction.

The Role Of Witnesses In Self-Defence Cases

Witnesses can make or break a self-defence case. Their evidence can support the defence that the accused acted to protect themselves, where the facts might otherwise be unclear. A good legal team will track down key witnesses through community outreach, scene investigations, or even private investigators. Once found, these can provide evidence that challenges the prosecution’s version of events and puts context to the accused’s actions.

Their statements may be used to challenge the credibility of the alleged victim and back up claims of an immediate threat. Here are the most common types of witnesses to consider to help support your argument in court:

• Eyewitnesses: In many cases, people who were in the vicinity of the scene and saw the confrontation can speak about the events that took place, including the threat level and sequence of actions.
• Expert Witnesses: Professionals with legal expertise can explain complex elements like threat response, force proportionality, or forensic details.
• Character Witnesses: People who know the defendant on a personal level can testify to their general behaviour or peaceful nature.

Physical Evidence Considerations

Physical evidence often carries significant weight in criminal defence—and in self-defence cases, it can be the tipping point. Visible injuries on the accused may help validate claims that they acted to defend themselves, while relevant documentation, such as medical records or forensic reports, can paint a clearer picture of what happened.

However, that same evidence can be cut both ways. If the accused shows no signs of imminent harm or if the scene suggests they had the apparent ability to retreat but didn’t, it may raise doubts. Without proper context, even strong evidence can fall short of establishing potential legal defences or creating reasonable doubt.

Building A Timeline Of Events

Timelines help make sense of the facts when facing criminal charges. Instead of scattered notes or assumptions, organize events in order to reveal gaps, contradictions, or patterns that may support potential legal defences. A skilled criminal defence lawyer will gather other relevant documentation, such as call logs, text messages, or reports, to construct a clear narrative.

Legal Precedents In Self-Defence Cases

Court rulings help define the limits of what’s considered reasonable when someone uses force to protect themselves. These decisions can directly impact how a criminal defence is built and what outcomes are possible.

Here are some of the most famous examples that have influenced self-defence claims:

• R v. Lavallee (1990): Acknowledged that past abuse can affect how a person perceives danger
• R v. Faid: Drew the line between manslaughter and murder when force goes too far. This can sometimes be cited in imperfect self-defence cases
• R v. Cinous (2002): Stressed that a belief in danger must be objectively reasonable to successfully argue self-defence

Working With Your Defence Lawyer

Trying to navigate a self-defence case without a skilled attorney can backfire fast. The law is complex, and your freedom could be on the line. At Brodsky Amy & Gould, you’ll get experienced, strategic guidance from lawyers who’ve helped countless clients successfully argue self-defence. Reach out today for a free consultation!

The post Self-Defence Claims In Assault Cases: Building A Strong Defence appeared first on Brodsky Amy & Gould.

source https://gregbrodsky.ca/self-defence-claims-in-assault-cases/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=self-defence-claims-in-assault-cases

Protecting the Future: Why Juvenile Criminal Cases Require Specialized Attention

Navigating the juvenile justice system can be a daunting experience for young individuals and their families. Juvenile criminal cases require a nuanced and compassionate approach to ensure that young offenders receive fair treatment and have the opportunity for rehabilitation. In this blog post, we will explore the importance of a strong defence strategy in juvenile criminal cases and how specialized legal representation can make a significant difference in the lives of young defendants.

Juvenile criminal cases are distinct from adult criminal cases in several critical ways. The primary goal of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate and reintegrate young offenders into society, rather than solely focusing on punishment. This approach acknowledges the potential for growth and change in young individuals, emphasizing the importance of providing them with the tools and support needed to become law-abiding citizens.

Understanding the Juvenile Justice System

Key Differences From the Adult Criminal Justice System

The juvenile justice system operates under different principles compared to the adult criminal justice system. Juvenile courts prioritize rehabilitation and consider the best interests of the juvenile client. The legal process in juvenile cases often involves more flexible procedures, with a greater focus on treatment programs and educational initiatives rather than punitive measures.

Emphasis on Rehabilitation and Second Chances

Rehabilitation efforts in the juvenile justice system aim to address the underlying issues contributing to delinquent behaviour. This includes providing access to mental health services, substance abuse treatment, and educational programs. By focusing on rehabilitation, the system strives to prevent future criminal behaviour and support successful reintegration into the community.

Common Juvenile Offences and Their Potential Impacts

Juvenile offenders may face various charges, each with different implications for their future. Understanding the nature of these offences and their potential consequences is crucial in building an effective defence strategy.

Drug-Related Offences

Drug offences are among the most common charges faced by juveniles. These cases can involve the possession, distribution, or manufacturing of controlled substances. The impact of drug-related offences on a juvenile’s future can be profound, potentially affecting their educational and employment opportunities. Addressing substance abuse issues through treatment programs is often a key component of defending juveniles charged with drug offences.

Violent Crimes

Violent crimes, such as assault or sexual assault, are serious offences that can lead to severe penalties, including placement in a juvenile detention facility. Addressing the root causes of violent behaviour and advocating for rehabilitative measures are essential components of defending juveniles charged with violent crimes. Defence strategies may include demonstrating the juvenile’s lack of prior criminal behaviour and their potential for successful reintegration into society.

Property Crimes

Property offences, including theft and vandalism, are also prevalent among juveniles. While these crimes may seem less severe, they can still result in significant legal repercussions and impact a young person’s record. Effective defence strategies for property crimes often involve restitution and community service as part of the resolution, emphasizing the importance of taking responsibility and making amends.

Building a Comprehensive Defence Strategy

A robust defence strategy in juvenile criminal cases involves multiple components, each tailored to the specific needs and circumstances of the juvenile client. Defence attorneys must thoroughly investigate the alleged crime, identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, and advocate for alternative sentencing options that emphasize rehabilitation.

Key elements of a comprehensive defence strategy include:

• Thorough Investigation: Gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and understanding the full context of the alleged offence.
• Challenging Evidence: Examining the legality of how evidence was obtained and whether proper procedures were followed by law enforcement.
• Alternative Sentencing: Advocating for options such as diversion programs, probation, and community service, which focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment.
• Personalized Defence: Considering the unique circumstances of each case, including the juvenile’s background, mental health, and potential for rehabilitation.

The Role of an Experienced Juvenile Defence Lawyer

Navigating the Unique Juvenile Court Proceedings

Juvenile court proceedings differ significantly from those in adult courts. An experienced juvenile defence lawyer understands these differences and can effectively navigate the legal process, ensuring that the juvenile’s rights are protected throughout the case. This includes understanding the nuances of the Youth Criminal Justice Act and how it applies to each case.

Advocating for the Client’s Best Interests

Defence attorneys play a crucial role in advocating for the best interests of their young clients. This includes presenting evidence that highlights the juvenile’s potential for rehabilitation and arguing for sentencing alternatives that promote positive development rather than punitive measures. An experienced lawyer will also work to keep the case within the juvenile justice system, avoiding transfer to adult court whenever possible.

Protecting the Juvenile’s Rights and Future

Ensuring that a juvenile receives fair treatment within the justice system is paramount. Defence attorneys must work diligently to protect their clients’ rights, challenge any evidence obtained through improper police conduct, and negotiate plea agreements that consider the long-term welfare of the juvenile. This approach not only protects the juvenile’s immediate interests but also helps secure their future by minimizing the impact of criminal charges on their record.

Potential Outcomes and Long-Term Impacts

The outcomes of juvenile criminal cases can vary widely, depending on the nature of the offence and the effectiveness of the defence strategy. Potential outcomes include:

• Diversion Programs: These programs offer an alternative to formal prosecution, focusing on rehabilitation through community service, educational programs, and counselling.
• Probation: Allowing the juvenile to remain in the community under supervision, with specific conditions aimed at promoting positive behaviour.
• Community Service: Providing a meaningful consequence that emphasizes accountability and restitution.
• Juvenile Detention: In more serious cases, placement in a juvenile detention facility may be necessary, but efforts should be made to ensure that the detention environment supports rehabilitation.

The long-term impacts of these outcomes can shape a young person’s future, making it essential to pursue the best possible resolution. A criminal record can affect educational opportunities, employment prospects, and overall quality of life. Therefore, a strong defence strategy that prioritizes rehabilitation and future success is crucial.

Invest in Your Child’s Future With a Strong Juvenile Defence

When facing youth offences, the importance of a strong defence strategy cannot be overstated. By investing in experienced legal representation, families can ensure that their children’s rights are protected and that they have the opportunity for a positive and productive future. A dedicated juvenile defence lawyer will work tirelessly to navigate the complexities of the juvenile justice system, advocate for rehabilitative measures, and support the juvenile’s successful reintegration into society.

In conclusion, the juvenile justice system offers a unique opportunity to address the needs of young offenders through rehabilitation and support. By prioritizing the best interests of the juvenile client and emphasizing the importance of a strong defence strategy, we can help ensure that young individuals have the chance to learn from their mistakes and build a brighter future.

The post The Importance Of A Strong Defence Strategy In Juvenile Criminal Cases appeared first on Brodsky Amy & Gould.

source https://gregbrodsky.ca/the-importance-of-a-strong-defence-strategy-in-juvenile-criminal-cases/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-importance-of-a-strong-defence-strategy-in-juvenile-criminal-cases

​

Restricted firearms are a big deal in Canada and you should know the ins and outs of the law for weapons offences. Owning an antique firearm grants you an exception from some of the rigorous laws associated with owning a weapon. 

There are unique laws associated with antiques that grant protection from regular licensing requirements. A good weapons offence lawyer can help you stay on the right side of the law. 

What should you know before buying or selling an antique firearm? Here are the criteria for defining what an antique firearm is and what a specific licence requires when you own one of these firearms:

What Is Defined As an Antique Firearm?

Before exploring the legality of antique firearms, it is imperative to know what falls into this category. Having a solid working definition allows you to categorize the firearms you own. 

Under the Criminal Code, there are two main categories for this type of weapon: 

1. A firearm manufactured prior to 1898 that is not capable of discharging rim-fire or centre-fire ammunition and has not been redesigned to do so
2. A firearm prescribed to be an antique

By definition, antique firearms could fall into any category including handguns, shotguns, or rifles. Make sure you understand the types of antique firearms before considering whether you need a licence in order to buy and sell these weapons. 

Types of Antique Firearms

While the definition of an antique firearm might be fairly vague, this is good news for collectors; there is a lot of flexibility in what falls into this category. Firearms of all types can meet the criteria for antiques if they have some of the following characteristics:

• Manufactured before 1898
• No discharging centre-fire cartridges or rim-fire cartridges
• Not modified to do the above

In other words, the Antique Firearms Act covers any matchlock firearm, wheel lock, flintlock, or cap and ball firearm that was manufactured before 1898 and has had no adjustments to its functioning. However, it can also apply to reproductions of flintlock, wheel lock, or matchlock firearms after 1897. 

There is one exception to this rule about reproductions: Cap-and-ball long arms and handguns do not fall into this category. 

Other types of antique firearms include: 

• Rifles: A rifle manufactured to discharge only rim-fire cartridges other than a 22 calibre long rifle or short rifle or a rifle manufactured for discharging centre-fire cartridges with a smooth or rifled bore and a bore diametre of 8.3 mm are considered antiques. 
• Shotguns: A shotgun manufactured to discharge only rim-fire cartridges other than 22 calibre short, long, or long rifle or capable of discharging centre-fire cartridges other than 10, 12, 16, 20, 28, or 410 cartridges is considered antique. 
• Handguns: A handgun manufactured to discharge only rim-fire cartridges or centre-fire cartridges with some exceptions are considered antiques. Exceptions include handguns manufactured to discharge 32 Short or Long Colt, 32 Smith and Wesson or Smith and Wesson Long, 38 Smith and Wesson, 38 Short Colt or Long Colt, 38-40 Winchester, 44-40 Winchester, or 45 Colt. 

Do I Need To Licence My Antique Firearms?

Many people want to collect these relics of the past but don’t want the hassle of having to meet licence and registration requirements. The good news is that if your weapon meets the above definitions, antique firearm licensing is not required. 

Unlike some other types of restricted firearms, you can do away with the need to have a firearms licence and you don’t need to register anything manufactured before 1898. You also may not need to register any black powder reproductions like a flintlock, wheel lock, or matchlock firearm. 

Ensure you are positive that your firearms fall into the category of antiques to avoid the legal repercussions of illegally owning a modern weapon capable of discharging modern ammunition.

Is It Legal To Buy or Sell an Antique Firearm?

If you want to add to your collection of antique firearms, you might wonder what the law requires for those who would buy and sell. Fortunately, the law is fairly flexible on what you can do with some of these older weapons. 

Because they don’t require a licence, it is perfectly acceptable to legally buy and sell an antique firearm. You can even give them away as a gift or as part of an inheritance if you want to lighten your load but don’t want the headache of buying and selling. Giving a loved one a relic of the past can be a great gift. 

You can even barter for/with one of these firearms and it is perfectly legal. This is good news for anyone looking to add an antique to their collection; you won’t have to jump through legal hoops to obtain one. 

Get Help for Your Weapons Offences

Do you need help facing a weapons offence, either related to antique firearm possession or something else? You require the help of a skilled weapons offence lawyer in Winnipeg like Brodsky Amy & Gould. We can help you face the charges against you and give you peace of mind. 

If you are facing charges, don’t hesitate to reach out to us today to see how we can help you lessen your sentence and minimize the repercussions. We are happy to discuss the ins and outs of whether your collection falls under the umbrella of antique firearms.

The post Are Antique Firearms Legal In Canada? appeared first on Brodsky Amy & Gould.

source https://gregbrodsky.ca/are-antique-firearms-legal-in-canada/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=are-antique-firearms-legal-in-canada

​

Possessing drugs and illegal substances used to be an automatic prison sentence, but the prisons have since been overrun by these offences. This is part of the reason why Canada is making a push to decriminalize certain drugs and make recreational drug use less of a social justice issue. 

Instead, they are now trying to treat it as a community problem. 

But what is drug decriminalization, and what does it mean for your future, your drug use, and how you can seek treatment for these issues? 

Here is what you need to know to protect yourself and ensure you stay on the right side of the law with upcoming measures and sanctions: 

What Does Decriminalization Mean?

Drug decriminalization is an important topic in the modern war on drugs: Taking away some of the criminal penalties for being caught in possession of certain illegal drugs. 

Why would decriminalization of drugs be so important for the welfare of the Canadian population?

In short, it allows more people to seek help for drug addiction instead of getting caught in the wheels of the criminal justice system. This approach is more effective than locking people up. 

Of course, there is an important distinction that must be made between the decriminalization of drugs and the legalization of those same substances. 

Legalization Vs. Decriminalization of Illegal Drugs

While decriminalization takes away from the penalties for being caught in possession of a substance, legalization is a different issue altogether. These two terms are not interchangeable, though people do tend to use them this way. Knowing the difference can help inform your position on the debate. 

Decriminalization lifts the penalties of possession and drug use, but it does not facilitate the legal sale of those substances. 

On the other hand, legalization means that people would be able to have access to those substances in the same way that nicotine, alcohol, and cannabis are available today: You can buy them at sanctioned businesses if you have proper ID. 

Substances are still federally illegal under decriminalization, even if law enforcement does not prioritize the punishment and correction of this drug abuse. Legalization would mean that there are no longer any illegal drugs and substances. 

Bill C-5: Proposed Federal Action

There is good news for anyone who is hoping for law enforcement to offer different treatment to those caught in possession. Under Bill C-5, this federal action would decriminalize minor cases of drug possession. This is an important introduction for several reasons. 

First, it assumes that drug offenders are likely struggling with substance abuse and treats the issue as a more social and community-based problem than is possible when imposing criminal sanctions. 

Second, it aims to protect the dignity and overall health of those caught in the throes of addiction. Instead of the usual course of punishment for these issues, offenders could be given the chance to seek drug treatment rather than jail time. Keep in mind that this applies to personal use and not for the intent to distribute. 

How does Bill C-5 impact health? Canada is catching up to other parts of the world and proposes to eliminate mandatory minimum sentences for drug possession. This simple act would cut back on over-incarceration, and be more helpful to bettering mental health in our communities. 

Would This Mean Drugs Could Be Sold Legally?

Decriminalization of drugs does not mean that drugs would be sold legally. It simply means there would be fewer drug arrests for possession (usually considered to be 2.5 grams or less). Controlled drugs are not going to be made available for purchase as over-the-counter medications, at drug stores, or anywhere else. 

If you are caught with more than the standard 2.5 grams, you can be charged with trafficking. There will still be penalties for this in Canada, usually prison time. 

Drugs will not be seized when found on a person. Instead, officers will provide drug education and help refer people to addiction treatment centers for recovery services. 

What Would Still Be Criminal When It Comes to Drug Use?

While you may be able to possess small amounts of certain drugs, there are still restrictions put in place. For example, you cannot possess these drugs in airports, childcare facilities, or schools. Depending on the area you reside in, there may be additional sanctions imposed. For example, Vancouver does not allow drugs at city facilities or private areas. 

It will also be considered criminal to possess more than 2.5 grams of these same drugs. 

Has Decriminalization Been Attempted Anywhere?

Yes, decriminalization of drugs has been attempted in other parts of the world successfully. 

In the United States, Oregon was the first state to decriminalize all drugs in 2021. Residents who had possession of drugs could either pay a $100 fine or engage in treatment services instead of jail or prison time. There are now 17 states with this policy (plus Washington D.C.). 

Other countries have also had a surge in decriminalization policies, including Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. Even Spain, Italy, and Germany have jumped on the bandwagon. There is an incredible precedent for this move around the globe. 

Do You Need Help With Drug Charges? 

If you are facing drug charges and need help to minimize your sentencing, you need an experienced drug charge lawyer. The system is complex and challenging to navigate on your own without years of prior experience and insight. Brodsky Amy & Gould is here to take the weight off your shoulders and allow you to rest easier at night. 

Reach out to us today to learn more about how we can assist you with your drug charges now. 

The post What Is Drug Decriminalization? appeared first on Brodsky Amy & Gould.

source https://gregbrodsky.ca/what-is-drug-decriminalization/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=what-is-drug-decriminalization

​

In Canada, assault charges cover a wide range of behaviour, from relatively minor altercations to extremely serious violent offences. Under the Canadian Criminal Code, the word “assault” doesn’t always mean someone was injured. In fact, an assault can occur even without physical contact. If someone is threatened or believes they’re about to be harmed, that could still count as an assault in the eyes of the law.

Knowing the different types of assault charges can help you better understand the legal process, especially if you or someone you care about is facing criminal allegations. In this article, we’ll break down each category of assault, the penalties involved, and why getting the right legal representation matters:

Overview Of Assault Charges In Canadian Law

At its core, assault involves the intentional application of force to another person without their consent or an attempt or threat to apply force when the person has the present ability to carry it out. That means pushing, punching, slapping, or even threatening to hit someone can all fall under the umbrella of assault, depending on the context.

Assault offences in Canada range from simple assault to more severe charges like aggravated assault or aggravated sexual assault. The severity of the charge typically depends on whether a weapon was used, if there was bodily harm, or if the assault occurred in specific circumstances (like against a peace officer or within a domestic relationship).

Assault charges may be prosecuted as either summary conviction offences or indictable offences, depending on the facts of the case. The difference can significantly affect potential sentencing outcomes and your legal rights during the process.

Simple Assault

Also known as common assault, this is the most basic form of assault under the Criminal Code. A person commits simple assault when they apply force to another person (either directly or indirectly) without that person’s consent. No weapon is involved, and there’s usually no lasting injury.

Examples might include a shove during an argument, a slap in a heated moment, or threatening someone while clearly intending to cause fear.

Though considered less serious than other assault types, a conviction for simple assault can still result in a criminal record, up to five years in prison (if prosecuted as an indictable offence), and serious personal consequences.

Assault With A Weapon

An assault with a weapon charge arises when someone uses—or threatens to use—a weapon during an assault. The weapon doesn’t have to be a gun or knife; it can be anything used to harm or intimidate, like a stick, bottle, or even a belt.

This offence is treated more seriously than simple assault because of the added risk of harm. The presence of a weapon, even if no physical contact occurred, can be enough to elevate the charge.

A conviction for assault with a weapon can carry penalties of up to 10 years in prison, especially when tried as an indictable offence.

Aggravated Assault

Aggravated assault is one of the most serious forms of assault in Canadian criminal law. According to the Criminal Code, an assault is aggravated when the victim is wounded, maimed, disfigured, or their life is endangered.

This charge is reserved for the most severe offences, often involving intense physical violence and resulting in significant or permanent injury.

Because of the seriousness of the harm caused, aggravated assault is always treated as an indictable offence and carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.

Sexual Assault Classifications

Sexual assault is any form of assault that occurs in a sexual nature, without the person’s consent. It includes a wide range of behaviour, from unwanted touching to violent rape. The Criminal Code separates sexual assault into three levels:

• Level 1 Sexual Assault: Involves unwanted sexual touching or contact without significant physical injury.
• Level 2 Sexual Assault: Involves a weapon, threats, or bodily harm.
• Level 3 (Aggravated Sexual Assault): Involves serious physical harm, maiming, or endangering the life of the victim.

All sexual assault offences are extremely serious and carry significant consequences. An aggravated sexual assault conviction can lead to a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

In addition to jail time, a conviction can result in mandatory registration as a sex offender, restrictions on travel, and lifelong personal and professional consequences.

Assault Causing Bodily Harm

Assault causing bodily harm is a charge that falls between simple assault and aggravated assault. It applies when the accused assaults someone, and the victim suffers bodily harm as a result. Typically, these are injuries that interfere with the victim’s health or comfort and are more than just minor or passing.

Examples might include broken bones, deep bruises, or a concussion. The injuries don’t need to be permanent but must be significant enough to show lasting impact.

This offence can be prosecuted as either a summary conviction or an indictable offence, depending on the details. Maximum penalties may include up to 10 years in prison for indictable cases.

Domestic Assault Considerations

Domestic assault refers to assault charges that occur in the context of an intimate relationship—spouses, partners, or even family members. While there’s no separate charge for domestic assault in the Canadian Criminal Code, these cases are treated with heightened scrutiny by the courts.

Law enforcement typically responds quickly to domestic disputes, and charges are often laid even if the alleged victim does not want to proceed. Once charges are laid, it’s the Crown—not the victim—that decides whether the case goes to court.

Domestic assault convictions can come with added consequences, including no-contact orders, loss of custody rights, and mandatory counselling. These cases require careful legal handling due to the emotional and legal complexity involved.

Common Defences To Assault Charges

While assault charges are serious, being charged is not the same as being found guilty. Several legal defences may apply, depending on the circumstances:

• Self-defence: If you used physical force to protect yourself or another person, and the force was reasonable, this can be a valid defence.
• Consent: In some cases, both parties may have agreed to the interaction (e.g., in sports or mutual fights), and the accused applied force with the other person’s consent.
• Lack of intent: If the accused didn’t mean to apply force intentionally or didn’t have the present ability to carry out a threat, this can raise reasonable doubt.
• Charter violations: If police violated your rights during arrest or questioning, the charges may be reduced or dismissed.

An experienced criminal defence lawyer will explore all possible options and ensure your rights are protected throughout the process.

Potential Penalties And Sentencing

The maximum sentence for assault depends on the type of charge, whether it’s prosecuted as a summary conviction or an indictable offence, and the circumstances of the case.

Here’s a general overview:

• Simple Assault: Up to 5 years (indictable) or 2 years less a day (summary)
• Assault With a Weapon / Causing Bodily Harm: Up to 10 years
• Aggravated Assault: Up to 14 years
• Sexual Assault: Up to 10 years (Level 1), 14 years (Level 2), or life imprisonment (Level 3)
• Domestic Assault: Same as corresponding assault charge, but may include additional restrictions

Other consequences may include a permanent criminal record, probation, loss of employment, travel restrictions, and/or court-ordered counselling.

Seeking Legal Representation For Assault Charges

Facing assault charges in Canada can be overwhelming, and the consequences can change your life. Additionally, the criminal justice system is complex. From bail hearings to disclosure reviews, pre-trial motions, and sentencing, the process can move quickly, and it’s easy to make mistakes that could cost you your freedom, reputation, and future.

That’s why it’s so important to speak with a skilled criminal defence lawyer as soon as possible. The right lawyer will help you understand the charges, build a strong defence, and guide you every step of the way.

If you’ve been charged with assault in Manitoba, don’t wait. Contact a Winnipeg criminal defence lawyer at Brodsky Amy & Gould for a free, confidential consultation. We’re here to protect your rights and fight for the best possible outcome.

The post Understanding Different Types Of Assault Charges In Canada appeared first on Brodsky Amy & Gould.

source https://gregbrodsky.ca/understanding-different-types-of-assault-charges-in-canada/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=understanding-different-types-of-assault-charges-in-canada